When it comes to large, long-term projects, the risks of using cross-platform app development technologies can outweigh the potential time-saving benefits. Additionally, React Native, the preferred cross-platform app development framework, was under a controversial license. It has been difficult for app development agencies to recommend its use. That's why they suggest delegating projects involving multiple apps to two native developers.
ContentsThe efficiency advantageThe benefitsNo code sharingLast wordsAre you hoping to reduce your expenses in your iOS/Android app development project? Then you should consider hiring the best Android app developers with equal expertise in iOS app development. Agencies like these have two native app developers, and this topic will attempt to help you understand the benefits of letting such a developer oversee your project.
According to a representative of a reputable mobile app development company, the company received a draft that required developers to create four native apps. Two of these apps were meant to be aimed at two different user bases with native iOS and Android versions for each.
As this was a large, long-term project, specialists weighed their options before launching the project. They found that the risks of using cross-platform technology tended to outweigh the time-saving benefits. Moreover, the world famous cross-platform framework called React Native was under a controversial license at the time. It was also difficult for the developers to recommend undertaking such a project.
In an attempt to fill the effort gap, developers had to be as efficient as possible. It was not an interesting idea to create the clone of two separate applications on another platform, at least from a budget point of view. The developers knew they could do something better.
Today, if you feel the need to hire an iPhone application developer, you should look for specialists who can handle large-scale projects. However, the team managing such a project must be more agile than usual. The advantage of working with such an app development team will be passed on to its clients, allowing them to enter the playing field more effectively while competing with the biggest names in the industry.
Once you hire an iPhone app developer, the team will start the project by implementing the app on iOS. There they will do most of the iteration and feedback. Skipping this process at this stage will require the development team to implement the same thing twice for Android and iOS separately, which will waste time and money as the app evolves rapidly.
It is also worth mentioning here that having two different iOS and Android development teams will not be efficient. After all, they will double the work and create more problems that need to be solved.
This is why you should keep your eyes peeled for app development agencies with developers who can build Android and iOS apps without compromising on quality or standard. Having a developer with a deep understanding of an application on one platform is invaluable in being able to quickly re-implement it on another platform.
In an effort to capitalize on the efficiency of having the same developer manage both platforms back-to-back, the team will keep the application architectures as aligned as possible to facilitate the implementation of the second application.
If your project timeline allows, back-to-back development will be more efficient almost every time and in every situation. Top Android app developers claim that lessons learned and problems solved the first time an app is implemented can dramatically increase development speed the second time.
Top developers can implement a feature freeze as soon as they sign off on the iOS app. This means that they will not try to shoot at a moving target. They will effectively port it from iOS to Android.
Another benefit of back-to-back mobile app development using the iOS app as a reference point is that developers will easily find bugs when porting code. As a result, they will make both apps more robust than usual.
On the other hand, developers will choose to use the concurrent development strategy if they need to meet time to market. However, it will be a more expensive undertaking for initial development and future development. After all, they will have to devote more man-hours to developing both apps. They will have to take care of the design differences from scratch.
The best Android app developers with expertise in iOS app development can avoid the path of “code sharing” between Android and iOS. When launching the project, most developers will choose Swift for iOS and Kotlin for Android because both languages are mature enough. Moreover, many similarities exist between these two programming languages, unlike Objective C and Java.
Ideally, code sharing is preferable to porting common components to another programming language. Again, as already mentioned before, there are risks of using a cross-platform application development framework for such projects.
There are experimental ways to use both Kotlin and Swift on iOS, but they're not production-ready. Although these have progressed over time, for the best developers they are not suitable for long-term projects.
Moreover, until a few years ago, few developers tried to implement the coordinator model on Android. Many development agencies have had to deal with this problem. The process of implementing the model on Android is quite different from that of iOS, especially due to the difference in lifecycles and memory management.
The main reason development agencies go this route is that they want to be as efficient as possible with the time and money spent on app development. The approach described above allows the best development teams to tackle large projects with small but nimble teams. As long as developers are efficient, customers will earn more on a limited budget. Everyone knows how valuable it is to be able to stand up to the biggest players in the market. These players have much deeper pockets, and to be competitive, such approaches are mandatory. They can make large-scale projects much more feasible.
