Whether it is a mobile or web application, one thing that guarantees its smooth operation and a good user experience is nothing but software testing. With the increasing demands of apps these days, testing mobile apps and web apps has become a popular practice. A good user experience can attract and increase user conversion and retention rates in an app, which can be achieved through app testing. Therefore, organizations around the world rely on application testing to create excellent and high-performing applications. Testing an application can present several hurdles and bottlenecks in the journey, as it is certainly not a straightforward process. But developing strategic test plans could make the journey smoother and easier. But the first step before developing a strategy is to recognize and resolve the obstacles in a process. Therefore, in this blog, we will discuss all the issues QA teams face in the test automation process.
SummaryUnrealistic Expectations for Automated Testing Using the Wrong Tools Automating Unnecessary Testing and Overlooking Important Test CasesTesting at the Right Time Lack of Proper Testing ConclusionAutomation testing has grown in popularity over the years because it makes testing easier, simpler, and faster. The biggest benefit is that it reduces the effort and time of QA teams. Here is the problem, although automating as much as the test cases is a good idea, it can even cause a crash landing where test case automation is not needed.
Although manual testing is underestimated, its importance should not be overlooked and practiced wherever necessary. Therefore, manual tests are suitable for the following tests
The first step in strategy for your testing efforts and especially automation testing in any project is to select the right testing tools. Selecting the wrong tools can affect efficiency
When it comes to automating test scripts, research work is very important. It is extremely important to thoroughly research which scripts should be automated and which test cases should be spared for manual testing. Neglecting research work on test case categorization for automation leads to less test coverage and leaves behind the most crucial test cases that need to be automated.
Refer to the automation testing pyramid which indicates that they start with unit testing because they are easy, inexpensive, and quick to perform. Then move on to API, integration, and component testing. Finally, automate UI testing and do just a few.
Starting testing after the software release has been developed is an outdated process. This process will surely compromise the quality of the tests. This does not allow QA to properly test all layers.
The remedy is to start testing before preparing to build. Starting testing early and often throughout the development lifecycle would yield wonderful results.
When QAs start using automation test cases, they are tempted to automate as many test cases as possible. This allows them to follow the pattern of running test cases and passing them without focusing on finding bugs. With automated test cases being executed repeatedly, it is tempting to automate the entire test case, thereby reducing human intervention and effort to a minimum. Such an approach has resulted in poor performance, poor test design, inconsistent and inefficient testing. Absence of manual testing can also affect poor test results because at some point human intervention is required for analysis, decision-making, and planning.
While automation testing is a very effective way to bring efficiency and quality into the application development lifecycle, it is no small feat because QA teams encounter multiple obstacles when testing automation. In order to make automation testing simple and productive, proper strategies for automation testing should be followed. But, before building strategies, we must first recognize the various bottlenecks we encounter when testing automation and also consider faulty practices that have caused failures in the past. So, in this blog, I have collected the 5 most common issues encountered during automation testing. Refer them to make your automation testing more efficient and productive.
Read also:the best kissanime alternatives
